Traditional Argument - 1359 Words

In 2011, there were 19,454 reported cases of vaccine preventable diseases in the United States alone (Rouch 2011). Most of these cases could have been prevented simply by getting a vaccination for certain diseases. There has been much discussion in recent years over whether or not parents should have their children vaccinated. Parents hear a great deal of information in the medi about the effectiveness and side effects of vaccinations. After hearing all sorts of negative things about vaccinations, it is easy to see why parents would be reluctant to have their children injected with all sorts of chemicals. In the end, the reason that children are not required to be vaccinated is that it is illegal to force someone to be vaccinated, but is†¦show more content†¦Many people choose to rely on what is known as â€Å"herd immunity† to protect their children from infectious diseases. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases describes herd immunity by saying t hat when a critical portion of a community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are protected against that disease (NIAID 2010). This lulls many people into a false sense of security from preventable diseases. This principle is based on the assumption that people are stagnant and that communities stay completely together all the time. In the case of the seven year old and measles mentioned previously, the idea of a herd immunity was proven ineffective when the child returned to the United States with the measles disease and infected those who were unprotected. Unless every single bacteria or virus on the planet is destroyed, there can be no way for those who choose not to be vaccinated to be protected from disease. There are a few exceptions where herd immunity is the only way to keep someone safe from disease. In rare cases, children cannot be vaccinated because they are allergic to part of the vaccination or because their immune systems are compromised due to cancer, HIV, transplants, and many other medical complications (Shepherd amp; Grabenstein, 2001). â€Å"You shouldn’t have the shot (MMR) if your immune system is weak because of cancer drugs, corticosteroids, or AIDS† (CDC, 2014). This happens inShow MoreRelatedVisual Argument911 Words   |  4 Pagesread this visual argument. This photo is self-explanatory. 2). What do you see? I see a man verbally abusing a lady. What are the key details or features here that stand out? The man’s face, fist punching the lady from his mouth, and the pain on the ladies face all stand out to support my theory. What images? The image is self-explanatory. What text? There was no text to support this visual argument. What supporting details? Every aspect of this photo supports my argument. 3). IdentifyRead MoreWhy Homosexual Marriage Is Harmful And Must Be Opposed893 Words   |  4 Pagestheir statements are based on biblical teachings and beliefs. As such, many of the arguments presented are subjective and perceived validity will vary with one’s religious standpoint. The primary claim is that homosexual marriage is morally, socially, and biologically wrong. Each supporting statement is separated into list format, so the connecting thread ended up being a bit disjointed. Collectively the argument appears deductive, though unsound. It is laid out in a valid structure; however, givenRead More Tennessee Williams The Glass Menagerie as a Tragedy Essay1498 Words   |  6 Pageslooking at the traditional definition of the classification tragedy, one can more easily assess whether or not the Glass Menagerie fits under this title. To do this I will be using the views of Aristotle, the Greek philosopher, who first defined the word tragedy and in his views, a tragedy contained certain, distinctive characteristics. His work was written in between 384 and 222 BC, and his views were taken on by some of the more traditional playwrights, suchRead MoreEffects Of Manipulative Materials On Mathematics Instruction Essay1684 Words   |  7 Pagesinstruction. Journal for research in mathematics education, 498-505. 1. Main argument or point? The paper argues that effectiveness in usage of manipulative learning depends on prolonged usage of concrete symbolic materials in learning and teaching across the ages in child learning process. However, the paper does not clearly outline particular manipulative learning that should be employed across the grades. 2. Structure of the argument: main sub-points and argumentation analysis? The main sub points inRead MoreWriting in Mathematics Seminar824 Words   |  4 PagesThis essay, although not feasible to implement in the real world, accomplishes the goals of a Writing in Mathematics seminar, which are to encourage students to think creatively about mathematics, increase the students’ skills in writing effective arguments, and show the students that there is far more to mathematics than what was taught in high school. Most of us arrived to this writing seminar in mathematics after we had been taught the dry, routine mathematics typically taught in high schoolsRead MoreThe On First Philosophy By Rene Descartes1699 Words   |  7 Pagesforget that everything he writes is based on the shaky foundation of the Christian God, and finds his later points less valid. We must look at Descartes’ argument in detail in order to establish why it is flawed and insufficient and thus undermines the rest of his project. His main argument for the existence of God is the so-called â€Å"causal argument.† He begins this train of thought by saying â€Å"because I am a thinking thing and have within me a certain idea of God, it must be granted that what causedRead MoreEssay about PhI 103Dq 4887 Words   |  4 Pages Fallacies in Media One rich source of fallacies is the media: television, radio, magazines, and the Internet. The arguments you experience in your daily life (work, family, shopping) are another source of fallacies. Identify three distinct informal logical fallacies you have experienced in the media or in your life. Explain how the fallacies were used and the context in which they occurred. Then, explain what the person presenting the fallacy should have done to ensure that he or she was not committingRead MoreEssay about Analysis of Theodore Dalrymple ´s What We Have to Lose1078 Words   |  5 Pagesdoctor and psychiatrist. Daniel in his writings has frequently argued that the liberal and progressive views prevalent within Western intellectual circles minimize the responsibility of individuals for their own actions and undermine mores which are traditional, contributing to the formation within rich countries of an underclass which is afflicted by violence, sexually transmitted diseases, criminality , welfare dependency and drug abuse. His writings are generally based on his experience of working withRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Charles Murray Essay1312 Words   |  6 Pagesof a B.A can lead to more harm than good. Murray’s main argument throughout his essay is that the perceived reward of a college degree disseminates to those seeking higher education and inevitably does more harm than good. He argues that many students do not have the ability to enjoy and finish a four year degree. This leads the student to being stigmatized and in debt due to his or her failure. Murray further establishes his argument by saying that more people continue to go to college becauseRead MoreIn This Paper, I Plan To Argue The Ideas By Edward Conard,1287 Words   |  6 PagesIn this paper, I plan to argue the ideas by Edward Conard, in his argument that we don’t need more humanities major in our academic system. In specific, this paper will explore the writer’s claims, the gaps in his arguments and counter-arguments in this topic. My argument is important because I will challenge Conard’s article with the self-fashioning’s article by Keohane. In Conard’s article, he demonstrates to answer the question whether or not we need more humanities. His answer is that we should